The reading stated that we can view scenes in art that would otherwise disgust us in real life.
Art has a way of deminishing the effects of reality. An example of this dulling effect is when someone sees murder scene, other then people who are use to the image, they are taken by shock, emotions of sadness, and fear. But when observed in a movie p.eople are calm when they see the image; content with the graphic content.
I have witness some people who play games so much that when they see a crisis on the news, instead of being concerned with the issues of the current cirsumstance, they are recalling a game they played, and even go as far as saying these crises are cool; ignorant to fact that the report is live and in real time.
While people enjoy art and all of uniqueness some experience a negative side effect.
Search for Beauty 2013
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Telvin Harrell: Art as Redemption
Friedrich Nietzsche view art as an escape of the world. Art he sees as soemthing to makr life, which is terrible, bearable.
Others would agree that yes life can be terrible and is all to often filled with things that are not right and crimes that go unpunished. But some people would disagree that the escape of such a thing is art. Earlier today I was visited by two Jehovah's witnesses in front of my house. The watch tower magazine that I was given asked the question what is the key to a meaningful life; the answer is Jehovah.
Athough nietzsche would disagree wtih the fact that religion could be the key to a meaningful life and the escape of the horrors of reality, being that he is an atheist; is he replacing the religious aspect of his life with Art?
Others would agree that yes life can be terrible and is all to often filled with things that are not right and crimes that go unpunished. But some people would disagree that the escape of such a thing is art. Earlier today I was visited by two Jehovah's witnesses in front of my house. The watch tower magazine that I was given asked the question what is the key to a meaningful life; the answer is Jehovah.
Athough nietzsche would disagree wtih the fact that religion could be the key to a meaningful life and the escape of the horrors of reality, being that he is an atheist; is he replacing the religious aspect of his life with Art?
Vincent - Hegel's Aesthetics
I
liked Hegel when we first got to know him because of his theory that there is
much more going on, and it begins with the sensuous. Eventually that sensuous
speaks to our soul because of this endorphin-driven sort of ecstasy where we
lose ourselves. I was going to do my original project on hegel and how music is
a purely sensual experience that beckons the soul to something greater, but I
found it difficult for me to work with just sounds and nothing mental like
words or images. I think this sort of sentiment on music and the soul has been
held widely for a very long time, so Hegel’s theory could hold true for many
people throughout many generations.
Vincent- Heidegger's On the Way to Language
While looking up theories for my
final paper I was suggested to look at Heidegger’s book On the Way to Language. It sounded quite complicated to me when I
first heard it and indeed it was when I first read it. And the second, third
fourth, so on and so forth. I had a lot of problems working through it before I
decided it wasn’t for me. He seemed
to be constructing a theory of language
as the very nature of being because of his famous phrase “Language is the house
of Being.” But
how can Language be the house of Being? This sort of reading left me with more
questions than answers, but perhaps that is for the best.
Vincent- Ingenium and Grassi
I
really like the lecture we had on Ernesto Grassi and his notion of ingenium, so
I read outside of class a little more. His book “The Rhetoric of Philosophy”
meshed well with the way I approach things because he Rhetoric is often separated
from Philosophy. As a communications major, I felt somewhat obliged to agree with
him on this sentiment. He referenced an Italian humanist philosopher named Vico
and brought up the idea of ingenium. Ingenium, as I understood it, portrayed
the concept that shows how humans learn about and create nature through
discovering or seeing something. It is more of a revelation of truth which I
found interesting, and perhaps sheds light on the creative process of some
poets and artists.
Vincent- Heidegger
Heidegger sees art as holistically
as possible. He believes it is not just the object, but the representation of
that object, creator of the object, co creators and everything there. The way I
interpret it, in viewing art in this way, it encompasses the spectator much
more and shows, in my opinion, a more modern view of art. In the Digital age,
sharing is a major part of creation, and therefore to view art as a communal
function and process would be accommodating to the nature of sharing in today’s
society. I think this theory on art is a useful way for people to see objects
of art in a manner they would not typically, that means including all the
context, all the creators, and all of the message that comes with it.
Vincent - Nietzsche
Nietzcshe saw art and the quality
of an object of art to be subject to the perspective of who ever is in
observation. This conception of art
offers a much wider variety of possibilities than some of the others we have seen.
In a Nietzcshian understanding, art can be found more commonly because man is
then creator and appreciator of art. I
like this sort of thinking because it is more empowering to the population, and
most likely encourages more of a widespread expression of art. We are all
artists. This is an idea that I think
should be spread more widely and perhaps
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)