Monday, April 22, 2013

Christian Holmes Class Reading #3


Van Der Leeuw’s point that western religious iconography was met with such fervent resistance when the icons representing the divine took the form of human was thought provoking. My first question is why this has not been more sharply discussed around the personhood of Jesus in recent years. Second, why are humans so significant? Perhaps we symbolize ourselves. When we see humans in art, we project ourselves onto them; our loves, dislikes, imperfections, fears, problems. Aspects of the self like fear and imperfection are uncharacteristic of the divine. We often think of the divine as free from our own shortcomings and failures. Perhaps the idea of God being like offends our hope, “If God’s just like me, then He’s just as much of a lying, cheating, and slandering mess as me.” Maybe there in lies the answer the my first question. Jesus is meant to be what man was meant to be. He was without our failings and shortcomings. In the image of Jesus, we have the chance to see the symbol of our messy manhood, and the hope and purpose found within the divine. Jesus is the perfection of holy icons because he is the most holistic of images.

No comments:

Post a Comment